Utsunomiya had no idea that Kitahara would unknowingly set such a trap for him. He was careless, really careless. He took it for granted that he would collate ancient books, simply understanding that it was to correct typos, not to correct typos.

Restore the original characters of ancient books.

In a daze, Utsunomiya raised his head and looked at the young man in front of him. At this moment, he had an inexplicable feeling that he could not see through this young man. From the first confrontation at the disciplinary hearing, to

In the first and current court hearings, the Kitahara lawyer behaved completely like a lawyer who had just graduated from college for two or three years.

He has zero practical experience in copyright law cases!

Why can such a young man do this?

Utsunomiya felt that what was happening in front of him was too unbelievable. A freak, a freak!

The university people in the auditorium couldn't help but change their expressions slightly when they saw this scene. The university management believed from the beginning that Shimokawa hired such a young lawyer because he saw that it was difficult to get tenure, so he tried to

A mistake from the university.

However, in the current scene, this "troublemaker" lawyer is actually on par with a famous professor from the university in a courtroom battle.

Utsunomiya felt the gazes from the listeners, and he immediately spoke to make amends: "Even if the so-called collation of ancient books is carried out using other collation methods or our own collation methods, the plaintiff must prove the relevant professional knowledge required for the selection of other characters."

"For example, if most of the manuscripts were formed in an earlier historical period, and there is a unified writing of a certain character, then it is almost certain that the character of the manuscripts in later periods is a corruption in the transmission. Then

In this case, no professional knowledge is required to make a judgment."

Utsunomiya's eyes swept over the information at hand, as if he had noticed something, and his expression showed excitement, "The actual situation is just like the analogy I just made. The Mustard Seed Garden Edition that the plaintiff relied on for the school,

Among the 17 manuscripts, its appearance is later than most versions, but it contains more fragments in comparison."

"In this case, the plaintiff can use the earlier version of the manuscript to make corrections directly without spending too much effort. The defendant has reason to suspect that the correction it made may be a simple correction based on the previous version.

.In this case, it is not surprising even if there is large-scale duplication."

Utsunomiya grasped the argument just now and extended it again.

To a certain extent, it can be regarded as easing the embarrassing scene just now.

Beiyuan looked at this action with a strange smile on his lips, as if he was watching an enemy on the shore who was constantly struggling in the rapids but was doomed to be in vain.

He gently picked up a copy of "The Eastern Land Parade to the Tang Dynasty" that was on the plaintiff's desk, flipped the pages, and murmured to himself, "It's really strange. Professor Fujimura's proofreading not only included most of the other characters, but

They are the same, even the collation notes are exactly the same. Could there be such a coincidence?"

The moment he heard this, Utsunomiya's heart tightened. The so-called correction notes refer to the author briefly writing down the reasons for adding, deleting, and changing words during the proofreading process. Usually there are only one or two words.

The form of a sentence. Although it is short, it can leave a basis for correction for others to refer to.

Could it be... could it be! Fujimura also...

Utsunomiya's face stiffened and he stood there.

Beiyuan admired the law professor's expression and pressed the remote control in his hand, "Chief Judge, please pay attention to the collation notes of this book. For example, the third chapter of the first volume, 'The ministers of the princes are called accompanying ministers to the emperor'. Here

The collation notes that there was originally the word 'gu' before '曰', which was deleted according to the Gaoshan version. That is, the original sentence in the original version is 'The ministers of the princes are called accompanying ministers to the emperor.'"

"Another example is the fourth chapter of Volume 1, 'According to Wolf Solitary'. The collation here reads, 'There are four stars under the wolf, which means solitary', so the 'fox' is suspected to be solitary. What is said here is that the Tang Dynasty envoy Guan Gu was sent to perform divination.

It is deduced based on the position of the lone star Wolf. Among them, the original text is 'according to the wolf fox'. This fox should be a mistake, because there is only the lone star Wolf and no star Wolf Fox in astronomy."

"Another example is the second chapter of the third volume, 'To show the princes to imitate the real power of the system'. What it talks about here is that Guan Gu, the envoy to the Tang Dynasty, noticed that Dongtu deliberately made the jurisdiction of each Jiedu envoy wrong, so as to

Check and balance each other. The collation note here is: Mo Yuan version, there is no word 'effectiveness'. That is, in the original version of Mo Yuan version, the original text is 'to show the power of the princes' shape.'"

"After all this, we can see that defendant Fujimura's proofreading work actually contains a large number of correction notes that are identical to plaintiff Shimokawa's proofreading of the third draft. Not only are the corrections of other characters exactly the same, but even the correction notes of other characters are exactly the same.

Same. I would like to ask, does this situation not prove that the defendant Fujimura is blatantly plagiarizing Shimokawa's proofreading results?!"

The suddenly amplified voice was like questioning, questioning the dean who did not appear in court.

After the voice fell.

The entire court fell into unprecedented silence.

The young lawyer's words were like a heavy hammer hitting the table, emitting irrefutable power.

When the university management saw this evidence, they could no longer control their expressions. At this time, their eyes fell on the great authority in Japanese law, and they were already praying in their hearts. Can this authority still be able to resist?

You can withstand such an attack.

Utsunomiya was silent. He was actually forced to speak by this Kitahara.

Yes, the dignified vice president of the Oriental Intellectual Property Law Society was actually forced to this point.

The law professor's mind was running rapidly, and he was quickly thinking of coping strategies. His thoughts were constantly diverging, almost draining every cell and nerve.

There was silence for nearly five minutes. It was as if he had finally found the answer that could be used to counterattack in the dark passage that turned thousands of times. Utsunomiya stood up again, holding Fujimura's "Eastern Land Parade to the Tang Dynasty" in his hand.

remember".

After all, he is an authority on Japanese jurisprudence.

There is no way he could be defeated so easily.

"Chief Judge, please pay attention to the preface of the defendant's book. In the preface, the defendant has stated that the collation notes include both parts written by himself, as well as collation notes written by ancients that were directly extracted from other manuscripts. Therefore, the collation of "Qian Tang Ji"

The Records of the Tang Dynasty actually consists of two parts - the collation notes of the ancients and the collation notes of the modern people. The ancients would also make collations and annotations when copying the original version of the Records of the Tang Dynasty."

"The plaintiff made a direct comparison without making the above distinction, and the result obtained must be unfair. The plaintiff should conduct corresponding investigations and remove the collation notes extracted from the ancient manuscripts to obtain the true comparison.

Regarding the results, the collation notes disclosed by the plaintiff are the same and are inaccurate, incomplete and untrue!”

As soon as this rebuttal was finished, the young male lawyer retorted violently, "Chief Judge, the standard required by the burden of proof in the Civil Procedure Law is a high degree of probability. Even if the comparison report did not include the above two collation records,

distinction, but the object of comparison is all collation notes. It can objectively reflect the similarity of the collation notes of the two collated works. If the defendant believes that the comparison results are not objective, he should provide specific evidence to refute it."

"In other words." Kitahara said in a cold voice, "The defendant's attorney should provide specific evidence to prove that the similar collation notes come from ancient collations! Otherwise, just such a general talk cannot be regarded as a refuted fact.

Give evidence!”
Chapter completed!