: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

As a researcher of communist theory, Qi Yiming naturally has extensive knowledge and research on remarks like Javier. Undoubtedly, many people feel that he is very incited after reading his remarks, and they also think it is a famous saying. It is not surprising that all the people would admire him so much. However, Qi Yiming did not think Javier was completely correct.

Trialing the combination of traditional Chinese philosophical concepts and redism to refute Javier's view. First of all, Javier believes that social stability is a false phenomenon. People dare not resist the government because of fear. They are more immersed in the choices of personal life and selectively forget greater political power. At first glance, it sounds very insightful, but it is actually ridiculous. This is a typical view of things from the perspective of self-admiring intellectuals, emphasizing humanism, and ignoring other people's demands and replacing others' demands with their own demands. In essence, they are arrogant and domineering. As Qi Yiming often said, some people care not about other people's lives, but about their own dreams.

According to Javier's theory, material life is far less than that of people's spiritual world. In order to pursue the freedom of self and higher levels of people, we should not be immersed in the "illusion of social stability". People should have their own choices to do what they are willing to do. This is a very wishful view in itself. After social functioning enters modern society, high division of labor is a typical feature. If everyone has the right to choose their own profession, then they just choose to be a painter or playwright, or they choose to engage in prostitution or make adult movies.

This does not mean that everyone must abide by the career plans formulated by others, but that personal autonomy in the absolute sense cannot exist. Just like in the later Czech Republic, a large number of women choose to engage in adult industries, which is itself a trampling on feminist rights and harming the country's economy and industries. But this is their freedom. Letting their freedom hurt the country and society. Things like this will always exist. This is why, as a power machine, the state must retain the function of macro-control of the economy and society.

Furthermore, the power of citizens to participate in politics is very good and glorious, but can it really be able to enjoy power for the whole people? Can we be sure that we will not become those imaginary masters like Javier and rich people who will eventually gain profits through such power? The continuous privatization of Czechoslovakia has created a large number of rich people. This is definitely not a fair thing, but Javier and other politicians shouted with shame that private property is sacred and inviolable. Why have they not considered whether these acquired property are legal?

For example, in a political system like the United States, after 9ll, the people needed a cathartic revenge export, so some people followed the fire and launched two wars against terror with public opinion to see what the ending was. The United States was very popular and began to face challenges from China after the economic crisis. When the person who really paid for such sunk costs was pushed to the whole people by politicians, no one was worthy of blame because the people supported the government to launch the war. If the people were wrong, it would be wrong, and it didn't matter.

So, those guys who shout all kinds of slogans are really sure that the noble thing you are pursuing can lead to a perfect ending?

In Qi Yiming's view, guys like Javier are nothing more than those who are good at organizing words, have certain logic and some knowledge and are unrealistic. Although not all intellectuals have such virtues, many people are calling for the benefit of the people while not caring about the people. Their greatness only exists in their hearts, and they do not really stand among the people.

Human nature, personality, and human dignity are worthy of respect and protection, but overemphasizing these things ignores the establishment of these material foundations and ensuring that these do not have any special effects, which is to emphasize the castles in the air, which are one-sided and vain.

There is no doubt that socialism needs more reforms to continuously progress and to move to a higher level of civilization. For example, strengthening political style construction, improving the smoothness of the people's reasonable demands, and using the system more flexibly to solve problems. We still return to the combination of Chinese traditional culture and redism, and we need to grasp it at a suitable level, break it up with totalitarian power, abolish power, and adhere to the doctrine of the mean, so that things can be achieved steadily.

By the way, Qi Yiming's dislike of Javier actually has no necessary connection with Jakesh's slander. Jakesh's position means Jakesh must remove Jakesh.

Unlike the previous model of directly arresting people and locking up, the Czechoslovakian authorities used propaganda positions to start rolling the evidence of Javier colluding with the CIA and other institutions in the United States and receiving huge bribes of more than one million US dollars.

These evidences include photos of him meeting and meeting with Western spies, recordings of their calls and conversations, and the content directly subverts the common perception of this dramatist with a very thoughtful and philosophical temperament. In the recording, Javier asked the Americans for money, claiming to organize larger demonstrations, and even demanded that he provide him with convenience for refuge when the government forces him to counter him. This is nothing, he actually promised some Western commercial groups to open a door to convenience for them after the change of Czechoslovakia, allowing them to enter Czechoslovakia in the name of a free market, erode publicly owned enterprises and obtain stronger Czechoslovakia technology.

The Czech Communist Party was still afraid that the audience would not understand, so they found various experts and began to exaggerate what major impact it would have on the Czechoslovak economy if Javier's trick succeeded, how many people would lose their jobs and cause a decline in national competitiveness.

What the Czechoslovaks cannot tolerate is that in a document, Javier actually agreed that if one day the Czech Republic and Slovakia choose to separate, he would definitely support such a move. This kind of separatist remark made many simple and patriotic Czechoslovaks extremely angry at Javier, who originally had a good impression of them.
Chapter completed!