In court, Kitahara launched a desperate counterattack. Zhuzawa was also completely stunned. The energy burst out by the young man in front of her completely exceeded her imagination. This experienced administrative litigation lawyer wanted to refute Kitahara, but in his brain,

Under the high-speed operation, it was completely blank.

Our own artillery positions seemed to have misfired.

No ammunition can be fired.

Takezawa was then horrified to discover a fact that was somewhat difficult for him to accept - that is, the lawyer in front of him named Kitahara was right. Indeed, the materials they had just given as evidence were all fact-finding on whether the paper constituted plagiarism.

The university did not inform Mikiko of the consequences of having her degree revoked, nor did it allow Mikiko to make a statement or defend herself against the fact that her degree would be revoked.

This Kitahara lawyer...he...what he said is...is correct...

A drop of cold sweat slid down the neck of Zhuze's back.

When did this lawsuit turn into this?

The expressions of the senior university officials sitting in the auditorium also changed. The situation reversed unexpectedly so quickly. Just now, the university side had presented so much material, seemingly firmly on the side with the upper hand, but only there.

After a few paragraphs, the lawyer Miu Miu turned out to be material that had nothing to do with the case.

At this moment, even Asakura Hiko who was sitting aside could not help but frown slightly. This great authority in administrative law smelled a hint of danger. At this moment, he also understood why this young man could repeatedly

He successfully obtained a blackmail lawsuit from a large enterprise. It seems that behind this, this young man still has some skills.

However, that's where it ends.

There is a mythical book called "Journey to the West" in Dongtu. Even if you have the ability to cause trouble in the Heavenly Palace, you can't escape the palm of Tathagata!

Asakura Yan stood up from the defendant's seat, looked at the trial seat and said, "The chief judge and the plaintiff's lawyer have also mentioned this point in the previous court investigation. We have also explained it to the court. When the expert team was investigating, it had already

Mikiko orally informed Mikiko that her doctorate would be revoked. Although the "Investigation Record" did not contain the content of the oral notification by the expert group, Mikiko signed and approved the "Investigation Record" and stated that she was willing to accept all disciplinary results of the university.

This can also in turn prove that the expert group has warned Mikiko of the corresponding consequences."

Kitahara listened to Asakura Yan's words and sneered, "The evidence provided by the defendant's agent is too indirect. Mikiko herself stated that she is willing to accept all disciplinary results of the university. It cannot be directly deduced that the university expert team has informed her of the corresponding consequences.

The consequences of having the degree revoked. In this case, Kyoto University bears the burden of proof to prove the legality of its actions. If the truth of the facts is unclear, Kyoto University should bear the consequences of being unable to prove it."

"I would like to remind the other party's attorney not to be so conclusive," Asakura Hiko said, "Whether the degree deprivation in this case is an administrative act is an undecided question. Secondly, the plaintiff claimed that the university did not inform Mikiko

The consequences of having her degree revoked are also untrue. The university expert team has indeed informed Mikiko of the consequences of having her degree revoked."

"Taking a step back." Asakura Yan took out a printed email, "I would like to ask the plaintiff's attorney to pay attention. During the communication process between Kyoto University and Mikiko, the expert group once forwarded "Kyoto University Research" to Mikiko

"School Student Code" and "Kyoto University Graduate Student Handbook". In the above-mentioned codes and handbooks, it has been clearly stipulated that if the results of applying for a doctoral degree contain serious academic misconduct, the degree will be revoked.

"

Asakura Yan began to press hard on Kitahara step by step.

Miyagawa heard these plausible words on the side, and her body was shaking slightly with anger. The university was blatantly lying. Before that, she and Kitahara had repeatedly asked Mikiko and checked her mobile phone and email. The university

It is true that Mikiko was not informed that misconduct in her thesis would lead to the revocation of her degree. But now, in court, the two defendant lawyers opposite openly claimed that the university expert panel had informed Mikiko of the consequences of the revocation of her degree. Why, they

How could he lie so shamelessly and openly.

Especially Asakura Hiko.

This great authority in administrative law.

I also came to the University of Tokyo to give lectures.

And it was such a great authority who blatantly lied in court.

Yes, this is the cruel reality.

People who are regarded as authorities tend to lie even more.

On the other hand, bystanders who do not know what is going on regard authoritative words as gods.

As soon as the professor finished speaking, Kitahara immediately retorted strongly: "Chief referee. Both the so-called "Kyoto University Graduate School Student Code" and "Kyoto University Graduate School Student Handbook" in the attachments have hundreds of pages.

It is obviously absurd for the defendant’s attorney to fulfill his duty of notification by forwarding two such documents, which are hundreds of pages long. The notification must be specific, clear and unambiguous. Such a way of forwarding notifications from the university manual is neither specific nor specific.

, it’s not clear either. It even requires the plaintiff Mikiko to look for the university handbook to check the relevant content. Can this be regarded as fulfilling the obligation to disclose?”

"If this can be regarded as fulfilling the obligation to inform, then wouldn't it mean that universities can use the handbook in the future and students should know the contents, so that we can claim that the relevant obligation to inform has been fulfilled?! This is obviously extremely absurd!"

The expression on Asakura Yan's face became increasingly unhappy, "Chief referee. Since the focus of the dispute between the two sides is whether the university expert group has fulfilled its obligation to inform Mikiko. So what the defendant's attorney wants to say is that the university expert group reported to Mikiko that day.

The interview with Mikiko took place in a classroom in the biology building. There were students studying in the classroom at that time. They can testify about the conversation that the university expert group had with Mikiko that day."

"In this regard, the defendant's attorney is now applying to the court for one of the students who was in the classroom that day - Chida Mayu to appear in court to testify in order to clarify the truth to the court!"

Kyoto University used its trump card.

Trying to remedy procedural irregularities through witness testimony.

This kind of witness application seems to have the unbridled laughter of a gangster.

It was like I was telling the plaintiff nakedly, even if I broke the law, so what.
Chapter completed!