Chapter 526 Paper

Following the judge's instructions, the trial continued.

The next evidence came to the second paper that Mikiko was suspected of plagiarizing. In the first paper just now, the issue involved was whether the outsourcing of the relevant experiments constituted academic misconduct. Under this issue,

It seems that there is still a certain room for maneuver. So in the second paper now, will the same room for maneuver still appear?

The atmosphere in the courtroom unknowingly became solemn, and the light emitted by the hidden incandescent lamps on both sides became dazzling. As the lawyers on both sides fought, many citizens who were watching had realized that this was a dispute.

Extremely bloody, life-and-death fight.

The senior university officials in the front row couldn't help but put their hands on their knees, leaned forward slightly, and watched everything happening in the courtroom with extremely serious eyes. Drops of cold sweat broke out on the foreheads of some university people. Even Asakura Hikohan

He gained the upper hand, but the whole debate process was too thrilling.

Zhuze sorted out the information in his hand, then stood up again, looked at the male plaintiff lawyer coldly, and then said: "Chief referee. Next, the defendant will present the seventh set of evidence. The first piece of evidence, the author

This is a copy of the publication acceptance letter for the plaintiff Mikiko Tamai's paper "On the Acidification Phenomenon of Phosphate Group-Oriented Molecules in Proteins." The publication letter comes from the journal CurrentBio. The second piece of evidence is an internal investigation email sent by the journal in question.

The third piece of evidence is the thesis self-examination email sent by the university. The fourth piece of evidence is the comparison group of the thesis "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules and Protein Acidification" "Imprinting Method of Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules" "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules in Protein Acidification"

Four papers including "Characteristic Phenomenon of Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules" and "Indeterminate Acidification Conditions of Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules". The fifth piece of evidence is the results of comparative analysis of papers. The sixth piece of evidence is the expert group's brief report on plagiarism in Mikiko's second paper.

"

One piece of evidence after another was thrown out.

This time the enemy seems to be more aggressive.

Miyagawa was in the plaintiff's seat. The hand holding the pen was covered with sweat, and her body was shaking slightly due to nervousness. Especially the pieces of evidence that Takezawa showed were almost like hammers hitting her ears.

The sound made people feel dizzy. Even so, Miyagawa still bit his lips and quickly recorded the other party's opinions with a pen.

Takezawa paused, as if leaving room for the audience to breathe. The next second, her voice sounded again: "The above evidence proves that the plaintiff Mikiko Tamai submitted an article to the CurrentBio journal titled "About Phosphate Groups"

Later, the journal received a report that the paper involved was plagiarized. Subsequently, the journal involved launched an internal investigation and issued a letter of assistance to the university. Kyoto University formally established an investigation team on the plagiarized paper involved.

Launch an investigation.”

Hearing these words, Beiyuan frowned slightly.

Someone reported it again.

Just now, Mikiko's first paper was reported.

And now, this second paper has been reported again.

Could it be that Mikiko was being targeted?

Kitahara kept chewing on the extremely obscure information revealed by the other party's evidence, trying to get a glimpse of the truth from some fragments.

Takezawa continued: "After a joint investigation by the journal and the expert group, the plaintiff Mikiko's paper was suspected of plagiarism from four papers, namely "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules and Protein Acidification", "Imprinting Method of Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules", "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules"

"Characteristic phenomena of protein acidification of directed molecules" and "Indeterminate acidification conditions of phosphate group directed molecules". The expert group of Kyoto University conducted verification through a third-party paper duplication rate appraisal agency."

"APDLU - is an internationally renowned paper duplication identification database. It made a paper plagiarism check report numbered KUYT456230 on Mikiko's second paper suspected of plagiarism. After a plagiarism check in the database, it was found that Mikiko was related to the above four papers.

A large area of ​​repetition. Specifically, there is a 36% repetition rate with the first paper in the comparison group "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules and Protein Acidification", and with the second paper in the comparison group "Imprinting Method of Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules"

The repetition rate is 16%; it has a repetition rate of 21% compared with the third paper in the comparison group, "Characterization of Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules in Protein Acidification", and compared with the fourth paper in the comparison group, "Indeterminate Acidification Conditions of Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules"

》There is a duplication rate of 27%.”

"In response to the duplication check results of the above-mentioned paper duplication identification database, the relevant expert group of Kyoto University conducted a substantive review of Mikiko's paper and formed a corresponding report. After discussion by the expert group, members of the relevant investigation team believed that the duplication of Mikiko and the control group of the paper

, is not a mere repetition of words or references, but directly constitutes plagiarism of the main text in the control group of the corresponding paper, without marking the citation or source. Accordingly, Mikiko's paper constitutes academic misconduct."

Zhuze's voice was resounding.

It seems to give people the feeling that she is like a prosecutor.

At this moment, she seemed to be in court, screaming at Mikiko for all the crimes she had committed.

Her voice then sounded: "Chief referee, the fact that Mikiko's second paper is suspected of plagiarism is now very clear. The relevant plagiarism facts include both the screening results of internationally authoritative software and the judgment conclusions of corresponding senior scholars.

The plaintiff Mikiko plagiarized the above four papers at the same time, and copied the relevant results and pieced them together. This behavior is enough to prove that the plaintiff has no integrity in academic research, ignores the most basic academic ethics rules, and splices them together wantonly.

Cut off other people’s research results! After doing such an act, you actually want to take advantage of it and sue the university. How can such a reversal of right and wrong be allowed to be recognized by the law!!!”

Takezawa loudly scolded Mikiko for her behavior.

With the display of this series of extremely powerful evidence, the trend in the court has changed again. There are both the identification results of the software and the conclusions of scholars. Moreover, Mikiko not only plagiarized one paper, but plagiarized four entire papers.

Thesis, this is simply irrefutable evidence, how can we refute this?!

The spectators in the next few rows couldn't help but whisper again, and the media reporters also secretly jotted down the latest status of the trial with pens in order to recover the details of the plaintiff's alleged plagiarism.

The materials that Takezawa displayed were piled on the table like that. Stacks of thick materials, the cold numbers on them, and the investigation conclusions of many authoritative scholars stamped with their bright red signatures, almost...

All point irrefutably to the fact that Mikiko did plagiarize relevant papers.

These are like the majestic volcanoes of the Orient, bringing a sense of oppression as tight as the tide.

Each piece of evidence seems like a sharp bullet, fired at the plaintiff's seat.

After all, for the plaintiff, is there any hope for this lawsuit...
Chapter completed!