The light emitted by the wall lamps on both sides of the courtroom became even bleaker. The colors in this space seemed to have faded a bit. The evidence that Takezawa threw out regarding Mikiko's suspected plagiarism in her second paper seemed like a piece of plastic.

It enveloped the plaintiff's bench like a bag, and then sucked out the air bit by bit. Each piece of evidence simply made those who supported the plaintiff because they opposed Takeuchi feel suffocated.

Is there any help?

It's probably hopeless.

The other party has thrown out so much evidence. It includes both the identification results of the software and the investigation conclusions of scholars. If you copy it, you have copied it. This is the result of black and white writing on the paper. How can you deny it? After all, lawyers are just lawyers, and they cannot turn black things into black and white.

In the face of this evidence, no matter how eloquent you are, you must admit it.

Many people watching in the court breathed a sigh of relief. It seemed that the outcome of the constant swings would finally be finalized because of Takezawa's evidence. This lawsuit should be over here. Just when many people had this idea

At this time, no one noticed that the male lawyer at the plaintiff's table stood up again.

The next second, Beihara's voice was heard again: "Chief referee, the evidence just cited by the defendant's attorney actually deliberately ignored an extremely important piece of information. The defendant's attorney avoided talking about it,

And it is precisely this point that will have a major impact on whether Mikiko's paper constitutes plagiarism."

Kitahara's voice is not very loud.

However, this passage reached the ears of everyone present very clearly.

The university executives in the front row couldn't help but open their mouths slightly when they heard this. Avoid talking about it? Deliberately ignore important information? And this information will have a major impact on whether Mikiko constitutes plagiarism? University executives

They repeatedly confirmed what they had just heard, and many even suspected that they had heard it wrong. Zhuze had already cited so much evidence, how else could he refute it?

It must be this lawyer who is making irresponsible remarks again!

However, when the eyes of the university's senior officials fell on the defendant's dock, their expressions were even more shocked.

There is no other reason. At this moment, Zhuzawa in the dock is showing an extremely serious expression, ready to record what the plaintiff's lawyer is about to say. Her face is somewhat resolute because of her profession as a lawyer.

The two beautiful eyebrows could not help but wrinkle at this moment. Yes, Zhuze was preparing for the attack at this moment. Obviously, she did not regard the words of the plaintiff's lawyer as an unfounded threat.

Takezawa stared closely at the Kitahara lawyer. There was a reason why she was so nervous. The reason was very simple. If the evidence was really irrefutable, how could she and Asakura Yan think of doing everything possible to avoid it?

The substantive issue of whether touching the paper involved in the case constituted plagiarism. Unconsciously, Takezawa had already felt a faint sense of oppression from the Kitahara lawyer opposite him.

Yes, very strange.

Obviously at the beginning of the trial, the other party was just a young man, and he never took him seriously.

But now, I actually feel a pressure in front of him.

Obviously the lawyer hasn't said a word yet, but Zhuze has already felt that the other party will definitely find out his own weaknesses, one after another, mercilessly, and with an extremely cold attitude.

Dig out all these weaknesses one by one.

Kitahara took out a stack of paper materials, pointed to the first annotation on the homepage of the paper, and said: "Please pay attention to the annotation information of the authors of the four papers involved in the case that are allegedly related to Mikiko's plagiarism. "Phosphate Group Orientation"

The article "Molecular and Protein Acidification" is the result of the scientific research project No. A5608 of the Department of Life Sciences of Kyoto University. The article "Imprinting Method of Phosphate Group-Oriented Molecules" is the result of the jointly applied scientific research project No. XA856 between Kyoto University and Osaka University. "

"Characteristic phenomena of protein acidification in phosphate group-oriented molecules" is a joint scientific research project numbered 6502C between the Department of Life Sciences and the Department of Chemistry of Kyoto University. The article "Indeterminate Acidification Conditions of Phosphate Group-Oriented Molecules" is a joint research project between the Department of Life Sciences and the Department of Chemistry at Kyoto University.

Research results of horizontal scientific research projects in cooperation with enterprises.”

Kitahara kept flipping through these papers and displayed the first annotations of these articles in front of the court.

The first annotation of the paper is often a note about the author's information. If the relevant paper was completed with the funding of a scientific research project, the related paper will often indicate in the first annotation that the paper is a related scientific research project.

The research results can be used as a basis for acceptance of project results at the end of the project.

The first article is the research results of the scientific research project.

The same goes for the second article.

The same goes for Chapter 4.

Some citizens who were listening began to feel dizzy, not knowing what the plaintiff's lawyer wanted to express. For the twists and turns in academia, ordinary people are not fully sensitive to the details and issues involved.

.

Immediately afterwards, Kitahara took out several A4 papers again and displayed them in the court. He was only heard to say: "Chief Judge. The materials displayed by the plaintiff's attorney now are members of the scientific research project research team of the four papers involved in the case.

As well as relevant email exchange records. When the plaintiff Mikiko was in college, she participated in the scientific research projects of the above four papers as a doctoral student. This fact can be proved by the list of research team members of the corresponding scientific research projects backed up by the university and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology."

"At the same time, the email records submitted to the court can show that the so-called suspected plagiarism part of the paper involved was actually written independently by my client Mikiko while participating in the above-mentioned scientific research project, and was sent to the professor in charge of the relevant scientific research project via email

.”

"On March 20, 2020, the plaintiff Mikiko sent the independently written third section of the article "Phosphate Group Oriented Molecules and Protein Acidification" via e-mail to the professor in charge of the project, Fumio Akutsu. 5

On August 21st, the plaintiff Mikiko sent the independently written fourth section of "Imprinting Method of Oriented Molecules with Phosphate Groups" to Airi Maekawa, the professor in charge of the project. On August 21st, 2019, the plaintiff Mikiko sent the "Phosphate Group-Oriented Molecule Imprinting Method" to

The third section of "Characteristic Phenomenon of Protein Acidification of Oriented Molecules" was sent to Kazuki Katano, the professor in charge of the project. On January 20, 2014, the plaintiff Mikiko sent the third section of "Indeterminate Acidification Conditions of Oriented Molecules with Phosphate Groups"

To Professor Yanagawa Ryuji, who is in charge of this project.”

Immediately, Kitahara picked up the software appraisal report that Takezawa had just shown to check for plagiarism, pointed to the duplicate fonts marked in red in the paper and said: "Chief referee, the so-called plagiarism part of my client involved in the case was his participation in the above-mentioned scientific research.

The chapters that were independently written during the project. The so-called plagiarized parts are all independent creations of my client."

Beiyuan's voice was not loud, and his tone did not have too many fluctuations.
Chapter completed!