Kitahara's voice fell, and the whole court seemed to be a little quieter. The debate between Takezawa and Kitahara on the identification of Mikiko's identity entered a heated stage. The argument between the two was like two ferocious beasts tearing each other apart in the jungle.

By biting and killing them together, in a moment, the opponent's life may be taken.

"There is no basis for what the plaintiff's attorney said!" Zhuzawa countered. "The plaintiff's attorney's claim that the student's identity is defined by the so-called point at which the university issues a graduation certificate is baseless. The so-called graduation certificate is just a document issued by the university for the purpose of

It is an informal diploma certificate that facilitates students to work and further their studies. It only serves the temporary needs of students between meeting graduation requirements and receiving degree certificates."

“The so-called graduation certificate does not indicate that the student has graduated, but only indicates that the student has met the conditions for graduation from the school and entered the list of degree conferrals.” Takezawa continued, “To a certain extent, the graduation certificate is equivalent to the university’s external certification.

The promise says that the student will definitely graduate from the school, but it does not mean that the student has graduated. It is through the promise that the student will graduate that the graduation certificate can be used as an informal diploma."

"Therefore, contrary to what the plaintiff's attorney said, the graduation certificate not only cannot prove that Mikiko has graduated from the university, but on the contrary, it can prove that Mikiko has not graduated from the university. This paper document can only prove that the university confirms that Mikiko will graduate at the time specified by the school!

Even if the plaintiff has been issued a graduation certificate, his identity is still affiliated with Kyoto University until he is awarded a degree."

Suddenly, Zhuze relied on his experienced experience to launch a counterattack again.

This experienced administrative litigation lawyer started from the text content of the graduation certificate itself and pointed out that the graduation certificate issued by the university does not mean that the student has graduated, but that the student will graduate according to the scheduled time. In the court, such as

One of the scales shook violently, making a "clang" sound, and tilted towards the defendant again.

The situation became tricky again.

The people representing Kyoto University are two industry experts with extremely rich experience in administrative litigation. It is extremely difficult to challenge them.

Miyagawa sat in the plaintiff's seat and felt an immense sense of oppression from the other party. The oppressive aura that a senior lawyer can exude is enough to make anyone who sees it feel afraid unconsciously. If we talk about the lawsuit itself,

It is equivalent to climbing the stone steps across the mountain, so the presence of the two lawyers on the opposite side directly cuts off the already difficult stone steps completely.

The serious expressions of the big shots sitting in the front row of the auditorium gradually relaxed. At first, the performance of the plaintiff's male lawyer was indeed a bit unexpected. But after several fights, it became clear who was better.

After all, you can't hide your badness, and you will still be beaten back to your original shape.

However, just as Zhuze was about to return to his seat, he glanced out of the corner of his eye.

She suddenly discovered——

The male lawyer was still standing where he was.

His expression remained as relaxed as before.

For example, since this trial, our own attacks on him have never had any effect.

Why...why can he still look so calm?!

Why does he still look like he is confident of winning? As if he is taking charge of this lawsuit.

He is obviously a kid who just graduated, but he still has such a young and mature expression.

At this moment, most people in the court did not pay attention to Kitahara. They only paid attention to the sharp rebuttal of Takezawa, a lawyer from Kyoto University.

Just the next second——

Kitahara's voice sounded, "Whether the two papers involved are the research results of Mikiko's studies, we need to look at objective factors such as the affiliation of the papers, the identity of the plaintiff Mikiko, etc. We also need to consider whether Kyoto University itself recognizes the two papers.

Whether this paper is a university research result."

The corners of the male lawyer's mouth turned up, he took out a few documents from behind, looked at the trial seat and said, "Chief Judge. After the initial news about the alleged plagiarism of two papers by my client Mikiko, Kyoto

The local 'J Weekly' asked Kyoto University to verify the matter. The university responded in writing to 'J Weekly'. The documents I have are the university's reply when the incident was first exposed by the media."

Kitahara unfolded the information in his hands. He saw that the document above started with the letterhead of Kyoto University, followed by a few lines of text. Although there was not much content, it was rare for such a top university to respond to reporters' inquiries. This picture

The information is a reply letter signed by the Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, which reads:

"Your journal is concerned about the plagiarism of two academic papers by Mikiko Tamai, a student of our department. After review by our department, the two papers were research results published by Mikiko's postdoctoral unit and have nothing to do with the university."

The words "not related to the university" are eye-catching.

The moment this reply letter was shown, the expressions of several university senior officials in the court became obviously stiff. They did not expect that the plaintiff's lawyer would actually dig out such a long reply letter. At the end of the Mikiko plagiarism incident,

When it first happened, the university immediately adopted a defensive attitude and tried to divert the trouble away. Without absolute evidence, it was impossible for Kyoto University to admit that its students were suspected of plagiarism.

So several senior professors from the Department of Life Sciences gathered together and decided to write a simple reply, informing the newspaper that the paper involved was Mikiko's postdoctoral thesis, not the results of the paper published during her doctoral studies, and therefore had no relationship with the university.

association.

However, the past attempts to shirk responsibility have become a powerful weapon against the university at this moment.

Sometimes things in the world are so absurd, so ridiculous. Strategies that I thought could protect myself turned out to be ropes that bound myself.

The atmosphere of the trial changed again because of the presentation of these pages of materials. For many university figures present, their newly relaxed mood became tense again.

Kitahara continued to say, "After the incident involving the alleged plagiarism of the referee Mikiko's paper, the university has stated to the media that the two papers involved were the results of Mikiko's postdoctoral research and were not published during her doctoral studies. Therefore, from the perspective of life sciences,

Judging from the reply from the department, it has clearly denied that the two papers can be attributed to the university. In this regard, whether it is based on the affiliation of the papers, the time when Mikiko issued the graduation certificate, or the life sciences department after the incident

Judging from the replies, all three can clearly and unmistakably prove that the two papers involved are not the scientific research results of Mikiko during her studies. Kyoto University revoked my client’s doctorate on the grounds that the two papers were suspected of academic misconduct, which has no legal basis!

"
Chapter completed!