Font
Large
Medium
Small
Night
Prev Index    Favorite Next

Chapter 250 Rhetorical Question

With just a few words from Miu Miu, Asakura Yanko made everyone present realize how huge the gap between the plaintiff and the defendant was. If the previous university briefing showed that Kitahara had filed several blackmail lawsuits,

It frightened some of the higher-ups on campus. The scene in front of him completely demonstrated that there was no need to worry. In the face of Asakura Yan's absolute strength, any resistance would be crushed.

Investigator Yuuki was also sitting in the gallery and witnessed this scene.

"This feeling is really annoying." Yuki murmured in his heart. During his career at the Accounting Inspection Service, this investigator has naturally seen countless corruption criminals using various covert and sophisticated methods to...

It has circumvented the supervision of the law. Now Asakura Hiko is taking advantage of this to circumvent the constraints of the evidence loss system, evoking memories of the kind of struggle with people that Yuki was familiar with when performing his duties in the past.

Obviously, this situation has greatly exceeded the ability of the male lawyer in the court. Yuki thought to himself, no matter what you do, you will never be able to defeat such a great authority.

Kitahara stood on the court and looked at Asakura Yan.

In fact, he had already guessed that Asakura Yan might attack like this.

But the reason why he continued to attack like this was for no other reason than to fight against absurdity.

Although summer insects cannot be described as ice, they are also a part of nature.

Although earthworms cannot shake trees, they also have their own power.

Although mantis arms cannot stop cars, they also have their own weapons.

The people trapped within the high wall are not domestic animals. Domestic animals will scream before being slaughtered. Not to mention the living people. Even if the front is a cliff and it is a losing battle, we must start

Attack. This is not recklessness, but because of dignity. People trapped within high walls and wearing shackles also have dignity!

The next second, Beihara said, "The chief referee and the defendant's attorney's understanding of the evidence disqualification system is incorrect."

As soon as Beihara's words rang out, there were faint sounds of sighing in the auditorium.

How ridiculous, how ignorant, and how arrogant that such a young lawyer wants to claim that an academic leader's understanding of administrative litigation law is wrong. In particular, Asakura Yan was also involved in administrative litigation back then.

The legislative work of the law. To claim that a person who has participated in legislation has a wrong understanding of the law would be the most ridiculous thing in the world.

The expression on Beiyuan's face was very calm, as if he had never been affected by the surrounding environment. He only heard his voice saying, "The Administrative Procedure Law stipulates that the defendant is not allowed to collect evidence on his own. The meaning should be that the evidence submitted by the defendant must not be

Contains evidence obtained after the commencement of the proceedings. The defendant's attorney claimed that the evidence was provided by a third party and was not subject to the evidence loss system. However, the evidence was still submitted to the court by the defendant."

"The chief judge and the plaintiff's attorney believe that the evidence submitted by a third party can be exempted from the restrictions of the litigation law if and only if it is submitted by the third party as a party to this case, that is, the subject of the lawsuit. If the third party submits the evidence,

The three people did not participate in the litigation as litigation subjects, but submitted evidence to the court through the defendant. So, in this case, the evidence should still be considered to have been collected by Kyoto University."

"If the law is not understood from this perspective, it will mean that the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Law can be easily circumvented by administrative agencies. The evidence loss system is just a waste document that exists on paper. In all future cases,

, the administrative agency can indirectly submit evidence through a so-called third party. In this case, what significance does the Administrative Procedure Law have for restricting the arbitrary exercise of power by administrative agencies?!"

Beihara's rhetorical question echoed in the court.

For a moment, it actually made people a little stunned.

He...who is he asking?

Are you asking a rhetorical question about the defendant's attorney?

Are you asking a rhetorical question about Kyoto University?

Or are you asking the judge rhetorically?

Or perhaps, he was asking rhetorically about this country called East.

"Chief referee!" Zhuze immediately stood up and retorted. She knew very well that the plaintiff's male lawyer's rebuttal was not actually valid. But for some reason, she actually felt a sense of fear. Yes, obviously.

It was a scene where she was sure of victory, but she felt scared.

"The plaintiff's attorney was extending his views at will, and the content published has nothing to do with the trial. The defendant's attorney would like to draw the court's attention that Kyoto University did not exercise its power arbitrarily. Its decision to revoke the doctorate was based on academic integrity and

The maintenance of ethics.”

As Takezawa spoke, he took the A4 paper handed over by Asakura Yan from the side and continued: "In addition, the defendant's attorney has obtained authoritative precedents from many higher tribunals. Among these precedents, there are third parties outside of Eucalyptus.

The evidence is transmitted through the defendant, that is, the administrative agency. The qualifications of the relevant evidence are recognized by the court. Accordingly, the argument of the plaintiff's attorney has no legal basis."

There was no further rebuttal from the plaintiff's bench opposite.

However, looking up at this moment, the lawyer named Beiyuan actually seemed to have a somewhat scornful smile on his face.

He could actually laugh.

However, the more this happened, for some reason, Zhuze wanted to say more. When this lawyer with extremely rich experience in administrative litigation was about to continue speaking, a voice suddenly came from the referee's bench.

Judge Kawada raised his head and said, "Okay. The defendant's attorney, there is no need to continue speaking on this issue. The collegial panel has understood your views, please continue to give evidence."

Judge Kawada's words interrupted Takezawa.

Zhuzawa wanted to continue to refute Beihara's words just now, but when the judge spoke like this, she had no choice but to give up. After a slight pause, she immediately began to flip through the court trial materials on the table, and then said:

"Chief Referee. Now the defendant presents the third set of evidence. The first piece of evidence is the "Doctoral Thesis Defense Application Form" filled out by the plaintiff Mikiko. The second piece of evidence is the correspondence emails between the plaintiff Mikiko, her mentor Muraki, and Vice President Takeuchi's research team.

The third piece of evidence is the "Doctoral Study Achievements Form" filled out by the plaintiff Mikiko. The fourth piece of evidence is the "Toyo University Biological Researcher Fund Application Form (for students)" filled out by the plaintiff Mikiko while she was at school."

"The above evidence can prove that the plaintiff Mikiko used two papers suspected of academic misconduct "On the acidification phenomenon of phosphate group-oriented molecules in proteins" and "Research on the secondary structure of proteins and nucleic acids under enhanced Raman spectroscopy" to apply for research funds
Chapter completed!
Prev Index    Favorite Next