Listening to Utsunomiya's sharp rebuttal, the university management in the auditorium breathed a sigh of relief, and their faces were filled with admiration. The moment Kitahara finished explaining the plagiarism, many of the management even had a question:

It felt like it's over. However, Utsunomiya stood up again and dismantled the opponent's offensive. In an instant, things turned around again, and things turned dark and bright.

The famous law professor looked at Beiyuan coldly, as if he thought the attack just now was not strong enough and wanted to fire again.

Utsunomiya decided to let the young man in front of him experience the horror of being completely buried in the court. He immediately picked up the two books of Qing Tang again, flipped through one of the pages, and said:

"Even if the annotations of ancient texts are not directly quoted, we can see that there are a large number of examples, which does not constitute so-called plagiarism. For example, the third chapter of the second chapter of "Report to the Tang Dynasty" tells the story of Guangu's acquaintance with a local man in the Shu area.

A senior official named Cao Jie. Among them, in the annotation, Fujimura wrote that "Cao Jie is a cheerful person, anxious for public good and righteous." However, this sentence actually comes from the description of Cao Jie's character in the Tang Dynasty, "Cao Jie

"Be generous in restraint and attach importance to principle and meaning.' In this case, although the sentence is in modern writing, it does not actually constitute the so-called similarity."

"Another example is the fifth chapter of the third chapter of "Report to the Tang Dynasty", which records that Guan Gu came to Qinchuan Cangcheng. Among them, Fujimura made an annotation, stating that the predecessor of Cangcheng was actually the Lecheng built by Kongming of the Three Kingdoms. Among them, this sentence

In fact, it also comes from the description in the ancient book "Qin Guancheng Ji Kao" that "Cangcheng was built by Zhuge, the Prime Minister of the Han Dynasty, and was originally named Le". Therefore, although Fujimura made an annotation in modern texts here, the content actually comes from

It is not the same as the ancient books."

Utsunomiya attacked forcefully one after another, as if he wanted to tear into pieces all the evidence that the young man had just given before he would give up.

The university administrators in the auditorium also showed subtle and understanding smiles, as if they were in the ancient Roman arena, admiring how the gladiators on the opposite side were bitten bit by bit by ferocious beasts, ending their lives.

Utsunomiya looked at Kithara's figure and continued loudly, "Moreover, there are many annotations in Shimokawa's proofreading manuscript that are purely factual descriptions. For example, in the third chapter of Chapter 4 of "Report to the Tang Dynasty", Guan Gu and Jiannan Road

The Jiedushi meeting. Among them, Xiachuan's annotation here only briefly states the birth and death years of the Jiedushi, as well as a brief evaluation quoted from the Tang Dynasty. Here, about the introduction of the Jiedushi of Jiannan Road,

It is also an extremely simple introduction of facts, without any original expression contained in it.”

The famous law professor flipped through the pages of the Notes to the Tang Dynasty, "Chief Judge! Through our review, we can find that the so-called annotations in the plaintiff Shimokawa Dianjiao's manuscript are actually mainly composed of two parts."

"The first part is nothing more than quoting the corresponding historical documents. The second part is a simple narration of historical facts. Neither part contains any original expression factors. In this case, the so-called similarities are simply

It cannot be avoided.”

Utsunomiya took a step forward, "For example, the record of the birth and death of Jiedushi of Jiannan Road just mentioned. Such records are repeated. What's the problem? Does my client Fujimura have to make up a different one?

To avoid the so-called similarities, Shimokawa can write about the same historical fact, but Fujimura can’t?!"

"Therefore, Chief Judge! The so-called comparison report presented by the plaintiff's attorney cannot be used to prove the so-called plagiarism of the annotations. The content of the annotations is either public domain material or an extremely simple factual narrative. It cannot prove the existence of the so-called plagiarism.

fact!"

Utsunomiya's voice fell heavily.

This is a textbook cross-examination opinion.

A complete demonstration of how to give the other party the most ferocious refutation from beginning to end.

This famous law professor not only demonstrated that annotations that purely quoted ancient texts should be excluded, but also demonstrated that even annotations written in modern languages ​​do not necessarily constitute the so-called similarity.

These arguments, one after another, rained down on the opponent's position like a barrage of artillery in the sky. Even the student union representatives who sympathized with Shimokawa in the auditorium were stunned, vaguely moved by these cross-examination opinions.

As for the university management, many people directly showed proud expressions, ready to watch the defeat of the plaintiff's lawyer opposite.

Miyagawa's heartbeat trembled as he listened to the sidelines. In the duel between Utsunomiya and Kithara on intellectual property law, he was completely unable to get involved, so... he could only sit in his position.

All eyes in the courtroom were focused on the plaintiff's table.

It was as if the plaintiff's bench at this moment had been turned into ruins under the flames of war.

Those eyes seemed to no longer believe that there could be any surviving figure among such ruins.

Many famous people in the legal field who came from other places also breathed a sigh of relief. They breathed a sigh of relief because this kind of scene is normal. A young lawyer who had just graduated was taught by a famous professor of intellectual property law.

Being forced into silence in court is a normal scene. But the previous scene of the two sides fiercely confronting each other, evenly matched, each with its own merits, is truly extremely abnormal.

"Does the plaintiff's attorney need to respond?" Judge Takanashi asked softly on the bench.

Just after asking this question, the young male lawyer sitting at the plaintiff's table smiled softly.

Yes, in the face of such a dangerous situation, he still smiled.

It was as if Utsunomiya's series of attacks just now had never existed.

He slowly raised his head, and his lazy eyes fell on the defendant's seat opposite. His eyes seemed to declare that what you just did was in vain.

The moment Utsunomiya saw Kitahara smiling, he was stunned. He didn't know why in this situation, the young man could still laugh, and he also laughed so naturally and comfortably. It seemed that what he was being questioned just now was not

He. No! It should even be said that it seemed like he was questioning someone just now.

Beiyuan stood up with the "Report to the Tang Dynasty" in hand, and turned to one of the pages, "The second chapter of the third chapter of the "Report to the Tang Dynasty", there is an annotation here, it's so strange. The second chapter talks about the experience of Guangu passing through Tongguan.

Among them, in the annotation, the description in the ancient book "Tongguan Kaolue" is quoted here: "There are two north and south Shuiguan gate towers, seven bays in the south and nine bays in the north. They are grand and clear, reflecting the Sichuan plateau."

"Please note that there is a typo here. There are two gate towers in the North and South Shuiguan, which are written as "two gate towers". May I ask why Shimochuan's proofreading has this typo, and the defendant Fujimura's proofreading also has this typo?"

Like a child asking curious questions.
Chapter completed!