"Before the promulgation of national standards and the safety of people's lives, no one is qualified to say, 'It is reasonable for me to do this.' Because from the perspective of my client, what the defendant thinks is reasonable is exactly

An unreasonable thing!"

"Even well-trained firefighters couldn't open this door for a while. Since the other party likes to make assumptions, can we also assume that if the person involved in this incident is not Professor Lu Zhongping, but a

A critically ill patient lost mobility after calling 120, so even if the ambulance and fire brigade arrived downstairs at the same time, would this patient still have a chance of survival?"

“Therefore, we cannot continue to talk about what is ‘reasonable’ in the face of established unreasonable facts, let alone simply equate doors and locks.”

"Let me give you the simplest example - would you like to ask the defendant, have doors and locks been held to the same standards from ancient times to the present? In my opinion, the safety standards of doors have always been far lower than the safety standards of locks.

This is the truth!"

Damn! Lawyer Hu's forehead suddenly became sweaty. The other party was obviously a master and found an angle that could influence the judge's judgment.

"The other side's lawyer's statement is suspected of misleading the judge." Seeing that lawyer Hu was clumsy in his words, Zhou Zhi immediately raised his hand: "Comrade judge, I request to speak."

"Student Zhou Zhi, you can speak, but please note that you can only answer this question from the prosecution lawyer."

The judge is actually very interested in this lawsuit, and has seen that both parties seem to be able to accept both winning and losing outcomes. They don't care much about "win or lose", they care more about "right or wrong".

"The other party's lawyer pointed out that the safety standards of doors have always been far lower than the safety standards of locks since ancient times. This is true." Zhou Zhi said eloquently: "But they ignored a basic premise, that is, this is not their subjective will.

It is a reality that has to be accepted reluctantly due to the limitations of objective conditions."

"When objective conditions permit, people's subjective wish is to hope that doors and locks have the same standards and requirements."

"Looking vertically, from ancient times to the present, the design of gates has made unremitting efforts in the direction of becoming stronger."

"Looking horizontally, the more important the place, the more conditions allow, the gates used will also become stronger."

"So no matter how you look at it, making the door stronger and stronger has always been the goal pursued by the people. I hope that the comrade judges will not be affected by what the other lawyer said just now. I have finished my statement."

Don't chase, don't involve, just discuss the matter and stop it abruptly.

Lao Hu secretly praised again in his heart, this man is also a master!

He has quick reactions and knows how to play. The judge likes people like this the most.

It seems that this is a very advantageous point designed by Lawyer Huang. It did have the effect of highlighting Qifeng before, but unexpectedly it was broken by the other party's little boy in an understatement, and the rhythm was disrupted all of a sudden.

Later, Lawyer Huang also questioned the legality of Zhou Zhi’s patent authorization, believing that Zhou Zhi was under the age of 18 last year and did not meet the conditions of an authorizer.

But Lawyer Hu was well prepared. In addition to various replacement authorization agreements, he even had his mother copy and sign the guardian's authorization letter, and then used the post office's high-end equipment - a fax machine - to send the guardian's authorization letter.

Under such a complete defense, Lawyer Huang's offense was obviously weak.

In the end, the judge pronounced the verdict: "Plaintiff Lu Zhongping sued Guanghan Hongqi Security Door Factory for causing safety hazards due to quality problems, and jointly sued Jingyang Jinan Locks Co., Ltd., and Zhou Zhi, the licensee of the security door patent, this court

It was agreed that according to the existing national standards and safety regulations, authorized by the patent inventor Zhou Zhi and sub-authorized by Jingyang Jinan Locks Co., Ltd., the security doors produced by Guanghan Hongqi Security Door Factory fully comply with the highest national level C

Standard, no flaws..."

"...To sum up, this incident is consistent with the characteristics of adverse consequences caused by improper use of products by users. Neither Zhou Zhi, the inventor of the patent, nor Jingyang Jinan Lock Co., Ltd. should bear the legal consequences. The lawsuit

The expenses incurred shall be borne by the plaintiff Lu Zhongping. If the plaintiff is dissatisfied with the judgment, he may file a second lawsuit with a higher people's court."

After the verdict of the case was announced, Li Xin invited both parties to the case to the studio for a secondary debate.

The two sides were not at war with each other, but rather felt a bit sympathetic to each other. In the end, the focus of the conflict was pointed at the lack of national standards.

In addition, the public utility department did not control new emerging things in a timely manner. My cousin demonstrated on the spot that with the help of professional special tools, it is not that troublesome to dismantle a safety door lock.

But this also involves a safety issue, that is, under what circumstances is it legal to use this professional special tool? Can it be used by maintenance personnel of the manufacturer, or can it be used only with the authorization and supervision of relevant personnel from the public utility department?

question.

To further extend, it is about opening the door of residents' residences and talking about the relevant legal issues involved. At this point, Lawyer Huang and Lawyer Hu started a heated discussion. In the end, no specific results were reached, but both parties reached an agreement, which is the entire work.

The formulation of flow and related procedures is urgent.

There was a happy ending at the end of the program. Xu Anran, the legal representative and chief engineer of Jinan Locks Co., Ltd., believed that although he was sued by Professor Lu Zhongping, he had no personal opinion against Professor Lu Zhongping, and was very

admire.

He believes that this case may be able to provide a great impetus for the country to formulate security door grade standards as soon as possible; formulate standard procedures for relevant personnel in public utility departments to handle similar incidents; strengthen professional training; clarify legal boundaries, etc.

And such promotion is undoubtedly benign and beneficial to the industry in which we work.

Therefore, in order to repay the lawsuit filed by Professor Lu Zhongping, Xu Anran decided to have a company fund the installation of a new security door for Professor Lu.

The program was broadcast three days after the verdict of the case was announced. On this day, cousin An Ran, cousin An An, and sister Can Can moved a TV to the office of the container house and watched it there.

As soon as the program showed the supplementary shot of firefighters using an electric grinder to unlock the door, the phone on the table began to ring.

Cousin An Anxin grabbed the phone: "Hello, Jin'an Locks, who is it... Ah, hello... Yes, I am Xu Anxin, hello, hello... Ah, yes, yes, we are also producing doors, brands

The one that has been registered with the Trademark Office is called Jinou brand... Don't worry, the quality is exactly the same. You can understand that Professor Lu's brand has changed... Hey, hey, wait for me to write it down, fifty sets, right?

?Okay, okay, bye!"

This was just the beginning, and then the calls started to come in succession, and orders came in like a snowflake, increasing again and again.

In addition to orders, there are also merchants with a keen sense of smell who are talking about authorization, consignment, and cooperation...

7017k
Chapter completed!