Subtitle of this chapter: winter-is-coming...

The book "Socialism" is divided into five volumes. In fact, Yuan Yan has just copied the first volume now. It’s not that he didn’t type fast enough, but that the content was too reactionary. He, an activist who has received the education of the Celestial Dragon Slaying Art, couldn’t stand it and had to make some modifications.

For example, the first volume that He Lian and Xu Zhimo just finished reading, this volume is based on a comparative perspective, comparing the situation of socialist society with a society organized in accordance with the principles of classical liberalism.

The first content in the first volume is not bad, such as praising the superiority of the capitalist system and the limitations of the democratic system, which are all the daily life of liberals.

In fact, these contents were reactionary enough for Yuan Yanran, who was "one red heart, two preparations", but he could not hold on to the content about "Family Political Economy" at the end of the first volume.

How did Professor Mises react? The following excerpts:

"The state of sexuality/excitement is the most important state in a woman's entire life. Women are always subordinate to the *** to a considerable extent. A woman is completely immersed in her sexuality/activity, immersed in the full range of *** and reproductive activities. That is to say, in her relationship with her husband and children. Her life revolves around these things completely, on the contrary, men are not just about sex..."

"So, **s fill the whole of women, and men are interested in other things, such as combat and play, social and banquets, debate and science, business and politics, religion and art..."

"There is only a woman's life, nothing else. But the life of a man is ** plus other matters."

"A woman with talent may still achieve something even if she is a mother. However, because women face the primary requirement of gender function, genius and great careers are not destined to be with her."

When Yuan Hongjian was in an era where "political correctness is greater than the sky, and women turn over and overwhelm men." Which Western scholar dared to say this? In a minute, feminists came to the door and smashed his dog's head into pieces, and even stepped on ten thousand feet so that he would never turn over. But if his face was thicker...

“Pickup.”

"Ahem."

In short, the old man Mises's straight man was unsaved, and he was at the end of his mind and heart. After he went into exile in the United States during World War II, even as a first-class Jew, he still couldn't escape the American academic circle because of the dominance of Keynesianism, but the prosperous civil rights movement could not tolerate such old antique, stubborn and old reactionaries.

Yuan Yan knew that it was fine to say this in the United States in 1920, but when she thought that she would definitely return to China. If this was spread to China, those feminists would know...

Wait, were the feminists in semi-colonial and semi-feudal society like China in the 1920s more powerful than those in later generations like the United States?

Unfortunately, it is still the case. Because China is a great era where new and old are mixed and there will be no life without revolution, and the United States is still enjoying the small era when the First World War brings prosperity. In other words, Chinese radicals are more radical than American radicals, while Chinese conservatives are definitely more conservative than American conservatives... This is not necessarily true. Don't forget that there are a group of Professor Chandler's fellow countrymen in the south of "Jianding Shizhou". They were conservative until they entered the 21st century without using electrical appliances, so they became a tourist attraction.

These dirty statements that "**** is the shortest path to a woman's mind" must not be used, so Yuan Yanshu had to modify it himself with the consent of the Master Ball system. In desperation, he walked on another reactionary path... The reactionary level of this path may be a little higher than that of Mises.

All leftist theories and left-wing thoughts, whether it is scientific socialism, the more left-wing Anacticism, or the more right-right Fabianism (gradual socialism), are all built on the basis of fairness. That is, only division of labor is different, no distinction between high and low. In fact, the pluralism of the white left also emphasizes fairness, but they abandon class theory and embrace values, so there is only different race, religion, gender and sexual orientation, and no distinction between civilization.

Since everyone is declared equal, then the status of men and women is naturally equal, and their rights and obligations are of course equal.

The problem is here. According to materialist perspective, no matter how wonderful the management theory is, it is impossible to overcome the cruel reality. The difference in physiological structure and function of men and women will inevitably cause inequality. Especially for the matter of having children, men only need to shiver... Well, even if the average time for male netizens claims to be one hour, women need a relatively long and extremely tormented pregnancy and breastfeeding period, not to mention the highest level of pain index and the natural childbirth with half a foot stepping into the gates of hell.

At the same time, socialism believes that marriage is a backward system under private ownership, and it is best not to even marry. Men and women (well, it is more precise to use humans) should live together for and only for love, because this is moral!

In fact, the above content is the view in Uncle En's famous article "The Origin of Family, Private Property and the Country". Uncle En himself never married for life, but lived together with a pair of Irish sisters. However, because of the "limitations of history", he expressed a strong anti-identical sentiment in his letter to Uncle Ma, believing that this is an "anti-natural" thing.

Moreover, the left has been developing so far, and it has become increasingly radical in the issue of women and sexual minorities. So there is a very wonderful thing in history that subverts the general view of people. Soviet Russia is a country with a Christian background in Western civilization, to be precise, and it is the first regime to decriminalize homosexual sexual behavior in modern times!

I have to say that Chizuo is really the ancestor of Baizuo, but the little hearts of Baizuo's little Bourgeois cannot accept the theory of class struggle.

In this way, socialism has only one choice, which is to return the right to reproduction to women. The logic is very simple. Since it is so unfair to women, let them make their own choices, which is called admitting to the gambling and accepting defeat.

Of course, Yuan Yanshu was talking about socialism in the 1920s, and he would not and dare not describe the subsequent history. In fact, there was a more extreme approach later, that is, the government controlled the right to reproduction...

Moreover, according to Master Yuan’s “inference”, even in capitalist society, as the degree of industrialization deepens, women will gain more and more economic freedom, which is equivalent to correcting most of the reproductive rights for themselves in disguise.

Whether it is capitalism or socialism, the fertility rate in industrialized countries has irreversibly rapidly declined, which is his foothold in criticizing the "Socialist Family Political Economy".
Chapter completed!