Temple of rocks.

Many times, whether a game behavior itself is the embodiment of game skills or the exploitation of bugs in the game, to a large extent, is determined by the game company...

The game company determines what kind of behavior is reasonable and what kind of behavior is unreasonable through judgment...

However, to a large extent, this judgment of the game company itself is actually unreasonable...

Because many game skills or game loopholes themselves do not have an absolute standard...

There is no standard for what kind of behavior is correct and what kind of behavior is wrong!

At least in the world of games, this standard is actually a relatively vague concept!

Just like the creation of a game plug-in!

Before the relevant laws emerge, making plug-ins and selling them for money is essentially just a behavior that is not too moral, but it is not considered illegal...

However, after the relevant laws were formulated, making plug-ins was undoubtedly an illegal act...

There is no doubt about this!

However, even so, even if the act of making plug-ins is considered illegal, the mistakes people make are absolutely impossible to be pursued before the law is formulated...

This is the reason why the so-called law does not prohibit it.

Even if there is a potential risk of illegality, as long as the law does not clearly stipulate that such behavior is illegal, it can be done. Even if this behavior itself is not very moral, at least at the legal level, this behavior is allowed!

In fact, in real life, many illegal acts themselves will not be subject to too many legal sanctions...

For example, if you act like usury, many people will think that this is a very bad illegal act when they hear it. But in fact, the most fundamental reason why usury gives people a bad feeling is actually not the lending itself, but a series of criminal acts such as intimidation extended by lending. Ultimately, it is just a kind of private lending. Ultimate itself is not completely unrecognized by the law...

Generally speaking, excessive interest will not be supported on the legal level, but the act of lending will not be erased by the law because of high interest. Simply put, money must be repaid after borrowing. What the law can guarantee is that the interest cannot be higher than four times the bank interest. That's all, but in fact, there are still many ways to avoid the risk of being detained through legal means. For example, the so-called nine out of thirteen returns is the most typical example...

From the perspective of a game company, although the rules of the game can be formulated, the lack does not mean that they can be punished without teaching!

The rules are wrong. After all, it is always the fault of the game company. Whether players can make profits through the fault of the game company is based on players' understanding of the rules of the game!

Even if players can make profits through some rules in the game, whether this profit is in line with the intentions of the game company depends on the attitude of the game company. If it does not meet the actual intentions of the game company, then this game behavior itself will be defined as using the game loopholes to make profits for one's own profits, and if it is a game behavior that meets the intentions of the game company, it will be defined as a game skill...

However, no matter how the game company itself defines the player's game behavior, or how to make up for the loopholes through the modification of rules, it should not be handled by players who have used the game rules before. After all, the reason is very simple, it is nothing more than that the law is not prohibited!

Many times, many things are very simple after all...

What is the biggest difference between games and reality?

After all, there is an essential difference between the rules of the game and the actual rules!

The law in reality is essentially telling people what things cannot be done and what kind of punishment they will be punished if they do it. However, the law will not forcibly prevent a person from committing a crime. It will only give relevant punishments after a person commits a crime...

Simply put, the law can only tell people what they cannot do, but whether people commit crimes is something that the law cannot control!

But the game is different!

Totally different!

The game loopholes in the game, and even various game skills themselves, can actually be corrected through the game company's adjustment of game rules!

Simply put, the law in reality is just telling others what they cannot do!

However, the game company's modification of the game rules can prevent players from doing this directly!

This is the world's difference!

In reality, whether people ignore the law and commit crimes, the initiative is in the hands of people themselves. Where is the law? Whether the law is violated, there are still violators who make decisions and judgments themselves...

In reality, every behavior of a person is essentially a manifestation of his own will, which can be said to be undoubtedly true!

However, it's different in the game!

Whether players can use loopholes in the game to make profits for themselves is essentially not entirely determined by the players themselves, but to a greater extent, it is determined by the game company!

If the game company lets it go, more and more players will exploit loopholes. On the contrary, if the game company fixes the loopholes as soon as possible, then after the patching is completed, even if the player wants to exploit the loopholes, he will not be able to do it...

It can be said that the game company has absolute rights in the definition and correction of game loopholes or skills!

This is essentially different from reality!

In reality, the law always tells people what can be done and what cannot be done, but whether to do it depends on one person himself to decide. The law can only make rules outside the framework of human behavior, but it cannot truly interfere with what a person does...

However, the game is different!

The rules of the game are absolute. In the world of the game, the rules are the core of the core!

The rules of the game are not something that players can do if they want to do not abide by!

As long as the player is playing the game, his behavior must be a behavior that conforms to the rules of the game. Any game behavior that violates the rules of the game itself cannot occur!

Just like in many games, the cliffs on the big map often cannot jump, because this is the map boundary set by the game. No matter how hard the player tries, it is impossible to skip the boundary set by the game...

However, in reality, at most a sign on the cliff tells people that it is a very dangerous place, but whether you stand on a cliff or just jump down is determined by people themselves. Although this is a very stupid thing, whether you do this depends on the will of the person in essence!

Because the laws in reality cannot really directly interfere with human behavior, so in a sense, everyone is actually free in the real world...

However, in the world of the game, players themselves are not really free. No matter how free the game is, players cannot exist independently through the basic rules set by the game...

There is no doubt about this...

This is the biggest difference between reality and gaming!

People do illegal and criminal things in reality. On the legal level, it is not very easy to convict. They need to have a complete chain of evidence and related evidence. If they do some acts that violate morality but cannot be convicted, they may often prompt the revision of the law...

However, even if the law is amended, the law enforcement officers are still human, and the perpetrators will not receive the punishment they deserve...

Many times, the law can only warn people not to do something illegal, but it cannot directly restrict people's behavior!

However, in the world of games, the situation is completely different!

In the world of the game, if a player commits acts to destroy the game order, he can definitely be tracked down. In addition, even if there are game loopholes that destroy the game balance, the game company can also correct it from the level of game rules, so that players cannot continue to use the loopholes to obtain profits...

And because of this, theoretically, a game company itself will never easily shut down the player's game account unless it is maliciously using plug-ins. Otherwise, even if you use game loopholes to obtain profits, at most, you can get the game account back or recover a large part of the additional income, which is already the limit...
Chapter completed!