Temple of rocks.

A noble moral level is naturally worthy of admiration for others...

However, excessive moral standards and moral standards are often daunting!

Many times, this is the fundamental reason why moral kidnapping is disgusting!

Moral kidnapping itself, in fact, is nothing wrong with it simply from a theory point of view...

Just like the story of Zigong redeeming people, it is essentially a noble behavior, but precisely because this behavior has been made public, it has formed a counter-effect, which makes most people feel that this is a moral kidnapping, which creates disgust for this behavior...

This is what some good people in the true sense tend to do good deeds without leaving their reputation!

The famous Lei Feng is the most typical example!

In a sense, as a model who is willing to help others, Lei Feng is more sober and wise than Zigong. He is very clear-headed and wise, and he is very clear-headed and wiser than ordinary people. Popularizing his own good deeds will not only not make the social atmosphere better, but may instead have a reverse effect!

It is because of this that he never leaves a name for his good deeds, nor does he publicize his contributions. He is very clear that it is one thing for him to do good deeds, and it is one thing for him to sacrifice himself. However, if one defines one's self-sacrifice as a moral standard, then there are probably not many people who can meet this standard. In this way, in a sense, it can be said that the moral level of society has been lowered. Because if one does not meet the moral standards, people will naturally lower their moral level. The so-called broken window effect comes from this!

It is because of this that Lei Feng chose a way to do good deeds without leaving a name to practice his good deeds!

It is precisely this cognitive and behavioral pattern that makes Lei Feng a household name!

His reputation is actually not only based on his good deeds, but also on his clear understanding of humanitarian order. He is very clear about what he should do so that he can truly contribute to society, rather than kidnapping on the moral level like Xiang Zigong...

In fact, Lei Feng's spirit has indeed affected generations of people and played an extremely positive role!

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

A moral role model with higher moral standards than ordinary people is naturally worthy of commendation, but no one should use such standards to measure other ordinary people. If you have such ideas, then the humanitarian order will become chaotic because of such a situation...

By the same token, getting money is also a widely controversial topic...

In the past spiritual civilization construction, people generally believed that getting money was a reflection of a relatively high moral level, and people were encouraged to do more of this...

But in fact, such encouragement itself is a violation of humanitarian order...

In a sense, unconditional spending time and energy on finding lost property and owner is inhumane practice. Many people are not unwilling to do something that is so easy to do, but if these acts of simple things cannot receive any kind response, and may even be questioned and suspicious, and cause trouble to themselves, then I am afraid that not many people will be willing to do such troublesome things...

It's like losing a wallet...

For those who pick up the wallet, the real value in the wallet is nothing more than the cash. In addition to cash, other items in the wallet, such as bank card and ID cards, are actually meaningless things for those who pick up the wallet!

However, for those who lose their wallet, the money in the wallet is actually the most useless thing. Whether it is an ID card or a bank card, this type of item is the most troublesome thing for those who lose their wallet!

For those who throw away their wallets, most people are probably willing to hand over the money in the wallet to those who pick up the wallets. As long as their wallet and the cards inside can be exchanged, most people will be satisfied with this...

On the contrary, for those who pick up the wallet, if the owner is willing to keep all the money in the wallet and only get back their wallet and various documents, then most people who pick up the wallet are willing to actively contact the owner and return the lost property...

In fact, this also constitutes a win-win situation for both parties...

For the owner of the wallet, it is naturally a happy thing to get back the items that are more valuable to him. For those who pick up the wallet, getting actual monetary rewards as compensation for their own good deeds is naturally a great thing...

If such a system is promoted, the probability of people being retrieved when they lose their wallet will be maximized. As long as the wallet is not stolen, but is picked up, then there is a high chance that the wallet can be retrieved...

On the contrary, for those who pick up the wallet, this is equivalent to the reward of their own good deeds!

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

On the contrary, if the so-called act of getting money is encouraged, then most people who pick up wallets will probably not be so active in returning the wallet. After all, returning the wallet itself is not necessarily beneficial. Even when encountering some bad owners, they will be suspected of being a thief, or even questioning their own motives. In such a situation, it is naturally difficult to have the idea of ​​actively returning the wallet...

After all, in the case of wallet loss, the owner itself belongs to the weak. Returning the owner's lost property is more of an obligation rather than a responsibility in the absolute sense. If everyone is forced to get money out, in fact, in a sense, it will actually promote the social atmosphere to develop in the opposite direction!

People’s moral concepts and behavioral habits can often be guided through one party’s way!

Forcefully restraining people's behavior, raising moral standards, and conducting moral kidnapping will only make people disgusted...

On the contrary, if the interests of the party who picked up the lost property and severely punish those who picked up the lost property, it can be relatively simple to reverse people's first reaction and attitude when picking up the lost property...

In some countries, there are relatively strict regulations for spitting or littering everywhere, and even smoking in some occasions where smoking is not allowed. Those who violate these regulations will be severely punished!

In such a country, people can easily feel that the other party’s moral level is generally much better than the situation in China!

In fact, this is not because morality is restricting their behavior, it is just because of the constraints of the law!

The behavioral norms themselves are not enough to restrain people's moral level. Most of the time, only by using legal means can we truly restrain people's behavioral patterns and thinking concepts...

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Of course, legal constraints are not the best way to develop morality. The most ideal way to develop moral concepts is to return to the perspective of humanity!

The so-called forced melon is not sweet, that's the reason!

Using law as a mold to distort the shapes of various melons and fruits, although it can achieve immediate results, it is actually not the correct truth...

Only when people agree with an action from the heart can they truly abide by order naturally...

However, before the humanitarian order develops to a certain level, it is naturally an inevitable thing to properly use the power of law to restrain human behavior...

Just like many people in the education industry have such a concept...

In the so-called education, if you want to achieve the best results, simply let your children learn, ask them to learn, and force them to learn, it is difficult to achieve the highest efficiency. Only by letting children want to learn from the bottom of their hearts can they achieve the highest efficiency!

The so-called asking me to learn and asking me to learn are two completely different concepts!

The former is a legal constraint and a parent's order, while the latter is a spontaneous interest in learning and a manifestation of subjective initiative!

For parents, for schools, stimulating children's desire for knowledge is in a sense the best way to educate. Using strict rules and regulations to restrict students' life and study can certainly improve students' learning quality over a period of time, but excessive strictness may lead to students' rebellious mentality!

Just like choosing diet to lose weight or taking medicine to lose weight, it may have practical effects within a period of time, but this effect cannot last too long. As long as the time is long, there will always be a rebound for a day. Even if the exercise is simple, it is the same in essence. As long as you don’t move later and restore your previous lifestyle habits, the rebound will only take minutes...

If you want to lose weight the most, you must not just simply take weight loss as your interest. Only by truly falling in love with exercise, being keen on exercise, getting used to exercise, and enjoying the happiness brought by exercise itself can you truly realize weight loss and have a truly healthy body...

By the same token, from a humane perspective, using the law to punish those who make mistakes cannot essentially change the evil of people's hearts. The law can only restrain people's behavior, but it cannot restrain people's nature!

Yes, human nature cannot be restrained!

Many times, people do not commit crimes or break the law, not because they don’t want to do this, but because they understand that doing that will cause trouble for them, that’s all!

And when they are not afraid of those troubles, or the impulses in their hearts break through the shackles of reason, they will no longer suppress what they are in their hearts, but will release them at will. Even for some criminals with high IQ, their crimes are often not the result of impulsiveness. It is just that when their reason tells them that through precise thinking, they think that their criminal plan will not cause any trouble to them. At this time, they will unscrupulously violate the rules...
Chapter completed!