Temple of rocks.

In a sense, whether it is pretending to be a pig and eating a tiger, or the so-called "I don't know Mount Tai" in essence, it is actually inhumane behavior...

From the perspective of the mentality of those superiors, he has no reason to dress up as ordinary people. Even if they visit privately, they will not do anything that is inconsistent with their identity...

For example, if they are wearing ordinary clothes, they will not go to various high-end places like they usually do. They will only do behaviors that match their identities...

After all, the so-called doctrine of the mean is essentially based on the basis of being right and right. What kind of identity a person has should do behaviors that match and conform to his own identity, so that he can conform to social cognition and be recognized by others. On the contrary, if a person's identity and the behavior he shows cannot match each other, then it is easy to be questioned and suspected...

Just like a person who is a rich man, but he has no car, no branded clothes and watches, and even less drivers and secretary, he is undoubtedly very unconvincing. Many times, the reason why people are despised is largely because of their own behavior problems...

Of course, the so-called bloody scenes appear, in addition to this factor, the other factors also exist, that is, the so-called doorman or waiter's lack of attention...

If a person is contempt and despised by others because of his inappropriate clothing or inappropriate words and deeds, then this person should naturally be responsible for this, because doing such behavior itself is actually inconsistent with humanitarian order. Just like some women who are too exposed on the street, they are always considered to be engaged in some unfair professions. Many people think that this suspicion is a kind of discrimination against others, but in a sense, it is not unreasonable...

People always have some conventional understanding of other people's clothing. Sexy and coquettish dress are also completely different concepts. Most of the time, on the street, those clothes are too exposed, at least in part, and are definitely people who are engaged in special professions, because ordinary people, even if they want to highlight their charm, will not use some excessively extreme clothing...

On the contrary, if a person has done everything he should do, dressed up, and his words and deeds are consistent in his expressions, and his actions are consistent in his actions, then such a person should and must be respected...

And if you still have a contempt or contemptuous attitude towards such a person, then it is actually an act that violates human nature and humanity...

After all, no matter what kind of thing it is, there is always a right or wrong, and there is always a scale...

Just like any alternating accident in reality, it is bound to be the responsibility of one or both parties. As for which party is more responsible in the accident, or the full responsibility of one party, it is naturally necessary to determine it according to traffic regulations. This is unquestionable...

But compared to law, humanity itself is a relatively vague concept. In one thing, if both parties have mistakes, then who has the biggest mistakes and whose mistakes are smaller, is often a concept that is difficult to weigh...

But no matter how difficult it is to weigh it, most people always have a relatively unified standard when judging right and wrong. This standard is completely different from the law. It is a completely different concept of judging right and wrong from a humane perspective...

Let me give you a simple example...

What kind of punishment should a dog thief be subject to?

If from a legal perspective, it is just stealing other people's property. If it is just a worthless local dog, then the dog thief will not be sentenced too heavily, and may not even meet the standards of stealing...

However, from a humane perspective, dog thieves are actually very, very hateful in the hearts of many people. How hateful is it? There was once a news that a group of dog thieves accidentally stabbed themselves when using poison needles to kill dogs, and eventually died of poisoning...

This is undoubtedly a relatively unlucky thing, but among the public's comments, no one thinks that these two people died unfairly. More people think that it is a matter of guilt that the dog thief was poisoned by the needle of his own poisoned dog!

Yes, sin deserves it!

In other words, in the subconscious mind of most people, even if the person who steals dogs pays his life for the dog, it is just a sin that deserves it!

This is the contradiction between humanity and law. In the law, it is just a criminal act that does not even meet the standards of the case. However, in the concept of human nature, this kind of behavior is worthy of death!

By the same token, it is also like a woman's affair...

From the perspective of real law, a woman's affair is not actually a criminal act, let alone an illegal act. At best, it is just a violation of morality...

However, from a humane perspective, this kind of behavior is difficult to tolerate!

In ancient times, women were soaked in pig cages or burned to death because of having an affair or having an affair before marriage. It can be said that there are definitely many women who were soaked in pig cages or burned to death. In that era, this behavior seemed to be natural for people to do so. It was worthy of being beaten to death. This concept is also deeply rooted in people's hearts...

This extreme concept will naturally not still exist in modern society, but no matter what, most people will not have any favorable feelings for such behavior...

Even if a man chooses to kill his wife because of his cheating in modern society, he may not be attacked by everyone, and may even be supported by some people. Because under such hatred and humiliation, for men, there is actually no reason to blame any choice...

If a man chooses to be submissive in the face of this situation, such a man will be considered a coward and unworthy of being a man by most people...

Although modern society has long publicly advocated equality between men and women, in fact, men still dominate the society. Men's affair is often considered romantic, while women's affair is often considered very serious moral flaws. Even at the legal level, people are more inclined to let cheating women be completely left home...

After all, this is also part of humanity...

This humane order itself is actually a long process of accumulation...

Similar to this situation, there are many other situations in reality...

For example, if someone is beaten, if someone is beaten, it is an innocent female student, then most people will have some sympathy for the girl, believing that severe sanctions must be imposed on the hitter in order to truly calm the public anger and face the sound of the moment...

However, if the person being beaten is a thief, most people would not have such a thought. As long as they are not beaten to death, most people will still agree with the behavior of beating the thief. Although some moral gentlemen will jump out and say that they should act according to the law, most people will still expect this way of being fist-to-heart to vent their inner resentment and dissatisfaction with the profession of thieves...

If the person who was beaten up was a human trafficker, then most people would probably think that even if such a person was beaten to death, he deserved it. The person who beat the human trafficker to death was not just a crime, but a heroic act, and should be commended...

After all, beating people is a crime, but under different circumstances and facing different objects, beating people is also a completely different concept in humanity!

By the same token, revenge is the same!

Whether the act of revenge is justice is essentially determined by the standard of revenge itself!

All hatred in this world is nothing more than cause and effect!

The kind of cause you sow, the kind of fruit you will get!

If the cause and effect are equal, then after the revenge is over, people will be able to understand their thoughts. On the contrary, if the revenge is excessive, then hatred will produce new hatred, which will turn into a situation where the revenge will be repaid...

Let me give you a simple example...

In the Tianlong Bashi, it is actually a story of a cycle of hatred...

Taking Xiao Yuanshan as an example, the source of hatred is the interception and killing of the three of the martial arts heroes...

The killing of a wife and the hatred of a child can naturally be considered irreconcilable...

So for him, even if he only did a lot of revenge and killed many related people, such behavior itself can only be regarded as a legitimate revenge...

In this matter, he was actually not wrong, because his revenge was always within a reasonable standard. The only flaw in it was nothing more than killing Qiao Feng's adoptive father and mother. Apart from that, there was almost nothing among the people he killed, which could be considered innocent...

For those martial arts heroes, they were killed by Xiao Yuanshan, but strictly speaking, the source of their hatred should be the leader at that time, that is, Abbot Xuanci of Shaolin Temple...

If Xuan Ci from Shaolin Temple wants to choose a hatred target, then there is no doubt that it is Murong Bo...

However, Murong Bo pretended to die, which made Xuanci only allow himself to become the end of the hatred of Xiao Yuanshan and his son, which also triggered a series of stories...

In a sense, the source of all hatred is actually in Murong Bo who is pretending to die!

In this process, the revenge of most people is reasonable and justified. No one is a good person in the true sense, but there is no evil person in the true sense!

Such revenge acts themselves are actually humane behaviors!
Chapter completed!