Temple of rocks.

In the world, any dilemma is actually a humane lack in a sense...

Just like the so-called choice that people face, it is an unselectable choice...

No matter what choice you make, in fact, in the face of such a multiple-choice question, the final result will be hopeless...

And in a reasonable humanitarian order, this choice itself should not appear!

Terminal illnesses will occur in any era and are almost impossible to be completely overcome. Although the medical level will continue to improve, new diseases will appear in front of doctors all the time. Among these diseases, there will always be some diseases with completely unsolvable medical means at this stage...

When facing these diseases, it often means unbearable pain, whether for the patient or the patient's family...

It is very inhumane and does not conform to the human laws that are humane...

From the perspective of social security system, if society develops to a certain level, there will inevitably be certain social security for terminal illnesses, such as fully bearing the medical expenses of patients, providing completely free treatment services, and even if social security has not developed to such a level, relevant legal provisions on euthanasia should be passed, because for terminally ill patients, if there is no financial assistance provided by the state, a decent and painless death may be the best result. It is a practice that will neither drag down your relatives and friends nor let yourself suffer...

And this practice, in a sense, can actually be said to be a truly humane behavior in the sense of...

The saying of humanitarianism is actually widely circulated...

But what is humanity in the true sense?

I'm afraid few people can explain it clearly...

Most people always have a slight understanding of the concept of humanity...

They can tell whether some things are humane, but it is often difficult to truly understand what kind of order is the real humane order, and what is the ultimate goal of humane order?

If you have to explain the concept of humanity, it is actually not complicated!

The so-called humanity means that people will never really despair. No matter how much pain or loss you are, they can always leave a glimmer of life and always leave a theoretically best choice for people!

The essence of humanity is the right to always be free to choose!

The essence of humanity is that it will never cause people to suffer from dilemma or have no choice!

The essence of humanity is that it will always prompt people to make choices that are both beneficial to themselves and others, rather than being in a dilemma!

Letting the law allow an innocent person to use medical means to achieve death is actually difficult for many countries or people, because killing a person is actually a taboo for human beings. Even if the killed person seeks death, this practice is largely contrary to human nature...

This approach is actually contrary to human civilization, so even if this approach is indeed the best choice some people can make, most countries still do not agree with such laws...

However, countries that agree with this law have only one reason to agree with it!

That is humanity!

Because this is a humane act!

Whether humanity or inhumanity is often not judged by the results. Many times, whether an action is in line with humanity is essentially determined by the process...

Just like a person dies. If it is death, then it is in line with the laws of humanity. Even if such a person dies, his family will not feel too sad, because people who die in their hearts do not have much regrets in their hearts. At least in the eyes of others, those who can die in their hearts are objects of envy...

On the contrary, if a person dies from murder or even abuse, then this behavior is inhumane and interferes with the survival of another person in a human way. This behavior must be investigated to the end. Even if the person killed is already terminally ill or has not had enough time, this behavior is absolutely not allowed!

Many times, saving people is not necessarily a humane act, and killing people is not necessarily cruel...

For some people who are worse than life, saving such people is inhumane. On the contrary, for some people who are worse than life, killing such people may be a humane act...

Whether it is killing or saving, in essence, they are actually part of humanity!

But what humanity focuses on is not the result in a simple sense, but the process!

If it is destined to die, then the pain can be reduced or even saved from pain in the process of death, which can be said to be a humane behavior...

On the contrary, it is also destined to die. If the process of death is filled with pain, then this kind of death cannot be considered humane and will be rejected by the vast majority of people!

Just like many people in this world can accept eating dog meat, but if someone abuses cats and dogs, they will also feel indignant!

Eating meat is not a manifestation of the prevalence of the weak, it is a law of nature and a part of the way of heaven, so naturally it will not make people feel guilty, but the laws of nature are part, and human desires are another part...

The most fundamental reason why the strong are abolished by people is a serious violation of humanitarian behavior. This is because of this, people will not feel guilty about eating meat. However, they will have an instinctive disgust for those who do not need to eat meat but cruelly abuse or even kill other lives!

If hunting is for food, then hunting is a reasonable survival behavior, and if hunting is for pleasure, then this hunting itself is unnecessary and will be disliked by people...

And the same is true for the behavior of killing animals...

Killing animals as food is no big deal, because it is the law of nature, but if you abuse animals without having to eat them, it is a very inhuman behavior!

For the human group, this behavior itself is not a criminal act, but this behavior itself violates the taboos of the entire human group, because the vast majority of people adhere to humanity and naturally have heartfelt disgust for inhumane behavior!

In fact, even when using various animals used in scientific research institutions, they will try their best not to let these animals suffer too much. Although sometimes drug experiments will definitely kill these animals, scientific research institutions will never let these animals die in pain. Instead, they will choose to end their lives in a simple and direct way and not let them suffer too much pain...

Even so, these scientific research institutions are often questioned and criticized by humanitarian organizations, thinking that some biological research itself is naturally inhumane behavior...

By the same token, such as the incident of abuse of prisoners, the reason is that this is why the impact is huge!

In the army, soldiers abuse prisoners, which is not a big deal. Many crazy troops are just casual in killing prisoners on a large scale...

Many times, although some behaviors are inhumane, they are not completely unforgivable...

Especially in ancient wars, a large number of prisoners would consume a large amount of food. The existence of prisoners itself is a natural threat to the army. Without a larger number of troops to suppress, no famous general could be suppressed by prisoners with a number of more than a certain base, because such behavior would be equivalent to a huge cancer growing in his own army...

It is because of this that although some acts of killing prisoners are inhumane, they will not be criticized too much...

However, in modern society, the situation is completely different!

In modern society, the number of prisoners in war is often relatively small, and there is no trouble of management and food scarcity. Therefore, when facing such prisoners, maintaining recent humanitarianism is the most basic requirement for any country...

At least for the vast majority of ordinary people, they cannot accept this kind of abuse against humans...

However, the army is different. The soldiers in the army are completely different from ordinary people in terms of their thinking patterns on many problems!

Especially the soldiers fighting on the battlefield, they actually take so-called humanitarianism very indifferently...

Simply put, the existence of soldiers is itself an inhuman product!

Especially the soldiers on the battlefield!

The so-called loving soldiers is like a son, and using soldiers is like mud. This is the reason!

In normal times, generals treat soldiers like their own sons, but once they go to the battlefield, these soldiers are just one number after another. Their existence is just to achieve strategic goals. When they really go to the battlefield, generals will not care about the specific life and death of a soldier. Sometimes, even some senior officers may die in chaos...

When the soldiers really go to the battlefield, life and death cannot be controlled by themselves. For them, whether they kill the enemy, or their comrades around them are killed, or even themselves, it is actually no big deal. They have long been used to the feeling of death coming at any time!

Their feelings, their concepts, and their understanding of humanity have actually been very different from ordinary people. This is why the army always frequently breaks out in scandals that ordinary people can't imagine, but it has no impact on the army!

Of course, all humanity is essentially based on the foundation of order, and the existence of the army is often the basis of order...

The army of any country is worthy of praise, because they have paid precisely their own erasure of humanity for the establishment of humanity...

The so-called "unwilling to be deceitful" is not a simple empty talk...

The so-called "unwilling to be deceitful" is not just a strategy or cleverness...

The so-called "unwilling to be fooled by war" is a real and unlimited act of over-limit warfare!

In war, people can abandon the bottom line, because compared with personal bottom line and principles, it can be said to be negligible to the success or failure of the war. Many soldiers actually had bottom line before joining the army...

But when they really need to defend their country, they are willing to give up any bottom line just to be able to protect their country!

Even many generals have done many things that seem inhumane to future generations because of defending the country, which have been condemned and even ruined because of their reputation. However, they will not regret their choices from beginning to end, because they understand that only the strong are qualified to talk about humanitarian things, and the weak are not qualified to talk about the so-called humanitarianism with the strong...

The difference between the army and ordinary people can actually be seen from the training methods of soldiers...
Chapter completed!